Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Penalty Kicks… By the Numbers

Penalty kicks are a critical time of decision making for both the goal keeper and the penalty taker. Given that, for most professional games, the average number of goals scored is around 2.5, a penalty kick can have a major influence on the outcome of a match. Penalty kicks may reach speeds near 125 mph and is usually over within a quarter of a second. Thus, the goal keeper must make a decision on how to stop the shot before the ball is struck. Statistics show that goal keepers will most often jump to the left or right, hoping to guess correctly and place him (or her) self in a position to block the kick. Is this action by the keeper the best strategy? Research headed by Michael Bar-Eli at the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Israel makes some interesting conclusions about how goal keepers should defend penalty kicks.

The researchers analyzed the video of 286 penalty kicks from professional leagues in Europe and South America as well as from the European Championships and World Cup competitions. They coded each PK into one of three vertical (high, middle or low) and horizontal (right, center or left) directions. Shots that missed the goal were not included in these analyses. They also coded goalkeeper movements (jump right, jump left or stay central) and whether or not they stopped the shot. Using simple statistics, they compared the success of goalkeepers in stopping shots based on their movements and where the ball was placed.

From the penalty kicker’s standpoint, 85% of the penalty shots placed on goal were successful. A bit more than half of the shots taken were placed in the lower one-third of the goal (57%). These low attempts were successful ~80% of the time. By comparison, only 13% of shots were placed in the upper third of the goal. However, all of these efforts resulted in a goal scored (100% success).

Slightly more shots were placed to the goal keeper’s right side compared to the center or left. Of these three directions, kickers were most successful when shooting at the center of the goal. Shots aimed at the center of the goal were successful 87% of the time compared to an 83% success rate for shots placed at the outer thirds of the goal.

Based on these numbers, professional penalty kick takers most often place the ball at the lower right corner of the goal (40% of attempts). However, they are far more successful when shooting at the upper portion. Thus, the most successful strategy for the penalty kick taker is to place the ball in the upper third of the goal area rather than the lower portion. Assuming that the shot doesn’t go over the crossbar, placing the shot in the upper region of the goal will almost insure a successful attempt.

Goal keeping behavior explains part of the goal scoring successes. In attempting to stop the penalty kick, goal keepers jump to the right or left 94% of the time. In doing this, they guess correctly only about 40% of the time (i.e. jump left, shot placed left). However, even when they guess correctly, they only stop 25-30% of the shots. The most intriguing part of the Dr. Bar-Eli’s analyses is that when goal keepers remain in the center of the goal and the shot is placed in the center, they make the save 60% of the time. Given that about 30% of penalty kicks are placed in the center third of the goal, remaining stationary in the center of the goal increases the keepers chances of stopping the shot from about 13% to more than 33%.

Thus, the best strategy for goal keepers is to remain in the center of the goal during the penalty kick. Thus the idea that goal keepers should jump left or right and hope they guess correctly is not supported by these numbers.

Why might there be more success when the goal keeper stays in the center of the net? When a keeper jumps in one direction, he/she is only able to cover about 1/9 of the goal area (usually the lower corner) plus a bit of the central area. Thus, if the ball is placed in the side or upper third, the keeper has very little chance of stopping the shot. The keeper is either out of position of in a poor position to stop the shot. However, if the keeper remains in the center of the goal area, he/she can cover closer to one third of the goal area (the upper-, middle- and lower-central areas).

If these numbers are correct, then why do goalies jump left or right in their effort to stop penalty kicks? Part of the decision may be based on experience, reading the shot taker’s body language and to opinion that diving is indeed the best strategy. Another reason probably lies in the concept of a “bias towards action”. This occurs with a decision is based on perceived need to “do something” rather than nothing. In sports, it is often said that mistakes are more forgivable if they are made at full speed. Diving to the left or right gives the appearance of effort and avoids the perception that he/or she didn’t attempt to make a save. In fact, a survey of goal keepers show that the vast majority feel worse if a goal is scored when they remain central versus diving to the left or right.

The take home message is that from a statistical standpoint, it may be more advantageous for a goal keeper to defend a penalty kick by remaining in the goal’s center rather than diving to one side. Despite the need to make a heroic effort, this situation may require doing less rather than more.

References:

Bar-Eli M, Azar OH (2009) Penalty kicks in soccer: an empirical analysis of shooting strategies and goalkeepers preferences. Soccer & Society, 10:183-191.

Bar-Eli M, Azar OH, Ritov I, Keidar-Levin Y, Schein G (2007) Action bias among elite soccer goal keepers: the case of penalty kicks. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28:606-621.

19 comments:

  1. Scientists in the Netherlands did a similar study about 15 yrs ago and came to essentially the same conclusions. Keepers are most successful staying in the middle and forcing the kicker to make a decision, then reacting as best possible to where the ball is kicked.
    ReplyDelete
  2. Staying in the middle will only be more successful if the kicker thinks the keeper will move. Therefore a keeper who only stands in the middle, once scoted by opponents, will succeed 0% of the time if they just stand there. Some sort of mixture with the majority of movements being remaining central would have to be the best plan from a keepers perspective.
    ReplyDelete
  3. These findings aren't surprising at all, and I have always wondered why every keeper needs to dive on PKs, most just guessing a side, when they would never do the same thing when trying to make a save during normal play.

    The above comment is correct in the context of a shootout or when the opposition has scouting on the keeper. Obviously any team or keeper who goes with a strategy different from the norm on a regular basis or in a big match will get publicity for it and it won't be a surprise anymore. But to incorporate covering the middle of the goal as an option to be used maybe half the time is worth studying.

    I see two areas of study for goalkeeping coaches going forward based on these type of studies.

    One: Can a new PK defending technique be developed to incorporate both reading the shooter's body language and the keeper remaining central and on his/her feet longer to better stop shots?

    Two: What positioning and strategy forces the shooter to make the most difficult shots? Obviously the easiest shot to get on goal is right down the middle, and the reason that many shooters don't want to shoot high is the fear of missing the shot. A goalkeeping technique that forces the shooter to aim for the high and wide areas of the goal, and to shoot with more power giving up precision, would force more misses and thus be more successful.
    ReplyDelete
  4. Not counting the shots that miss the goal makes this study worthless. The conclusion is that players taking a penalty should aim for a top corner--true only if they never miss! But how often do players miss the goal entirely based upon where they were aiming? I.e. if a player shooting for the top third is never denied by the keeper but misses the goal 25% of the time that is a worse outcome than the player who aims for the lower third and keeps the ball on target 95% of the time, despite the fact that the goalkeeper will then save the shot 20% of the time.

    An incomplete analysis at best...
    ReplyDelete
  5. A soccer ball doesn't travel 125 mph, I don't care who is kicking it.
    ReplyDelete
  6. This study definitely has some good perspective....but it certainly must be followed up with more detailed studies and analysis (something that i expect from a doctor.....otherwise they should've just let me do this paper).

    Obviously you cant conclude that keepers should stay central or then shooters would just stop shooting centrally and eventually we'd get back to where we are. A much more interesting talk would be to see how goalkeepers could incorporate methods to choose the best directions to dive/not dive to increase success......though luck will always be the prevailing factor.
    ReplyDelete
  7. Not sure if this is a factor in the 'keeper's decision, but a diving save will get your teammates and fans more pumped up than will a save made while standing like a tree.
    ReplyDelete
  8. Every action has a reaction, shooting towards the upper right will not insure greater success because if more and more players shot in that direction, goalkeepers would adjust accordingly.

    Still, great research and great website. The most glaring statistic for me is that 85% of penalty shots are successful. What this says is that the tie-breaking system is broken. Basically a shooter is never supposed to miss. A fairer system gives a fair chance to the shooter to convert AND to the goalkeeper to save.

    Thus, the spot should be moved back from its current position. More shots will sail high or wide, but an 85% success rate under the current system is unacceptable. Games should not be decided just because a shooter succumbs to mental duress, which is usually the only reason for a miss considering the high conversion rate.

    Actually, I never saw a problem with the old American system of having a shooter dribble towards the goal starting from 35 yards out.
    1. Gives the excitement of a breakaway.
    2. More resembles actual play
    3. More fair to the goalkeeper.
    ReplyDelete
  9. I agree; the American system worked, even though purists here hated it. Of course, my preference has nothing to with the fact that I was pretty good at this drill in high school. ;)
    ReplyDelete
  10. the stats are interesting...however, stopping a PK as a GK is an intuitive skill utilizing all of the above stategies at various times...
    ReplyDelete
  11. Ilearned a lot from this reading.
    ReplyDelete
  12. Most saved penalties are the result of poorly struck kicks, the keeper cannot really do a whole lot, its up to kicker to miss in other words.
    ReplyDelete
  13. what are the odds of a keeper making 5 penalty saves in one game in a tournament to advance to the next round.... not too high i can tell you that but i did it. stopping penalties is my specialty. i stopped 5 in one game when we couldnt score in extra time we went to penalties. then my team missed the net and put the pressure on me. but i stopped all the shots that shootout. im 19, and my shoot out save percentage is more than 50% i know that.
    ReplyDelete
  14. I played Keeper for 24 years and have coached Keepers for 10 years. Saving PKs was one of my greatest strengths. (I also stopped 5 PKs in overtime to send my men's team to a final) Many of the PKs I saved to my left were easier because the shooter opened his hips and reduced power...but not as a rule. Some Keepers guess...some stay put...I prefer to read the 4 clues every shooter gives. Angle of approach, plant foot angle, shooting foot movement as it approaches, and hips opening up. Each clue can mislead, but combined they are extremely reliable. It is rare that a Keeper can read all 4 clues before the ball is struck. The Keeper who reads clues must anticipate the direction of the shot based upon the clues presented before the ball is struck or wait to respond to the ball. If I had to rely on just one clue it would be the shooting foot as it approaches the ball. Not an easy read with a power shooter!

    My Keepers have improved their shot stopping as they developed their reading and anticipating skills. I won't coach a Keeper who guesses!

    The PK isn't intended to be "fair" to the Keeper or their team...it is a chance to escape a punishment for a foul. Having said that...The American system of breakaways is by far the better "fairer" way to resolve a tie!
    ReplyDelete
  15. Staying in the centre can only be more successful for so long; after a while you'll get a reputation among opposing teams as 'the keeper who stays in the middle' and they'll all start hitting the ball left or right.
    ReplyDelete
  16. 85% of penalties are successful.
    This leaves 15% unconverted. I don’t know the stats but my estimated figures after watching the game for over 40 years are:
    7% saved by the keeper (stopped and held, tipped over the bar, pushed past the post)
    6% missed the target by the penalty taker
    1% saved but successfully followed up by the penalty taker
    This leaves 1% (only 1 in 100) involving the other players watching the kick so
    WHY do players, both attackers and defenders, encroach into the area thereby risking the referee ordering a retake?
    ReplyDelete
  17. As a goal keepers i have heard in training that there is only a 3% chance of saving the PK, so it is actually more important to do things to psych the kicker out, though this hard to research, as you cant tell from footage whether the player is pysched out or not. The staying in the center makes sense for professionals as they can curve the ball and have more control as to keep it under the crossbar, but for kids, highschool and college teams PKs are more often scored in the bottom corners because thats where the kicker is taught to shoot. Also the diving to one side or another is often chosen by the goal kepper by which is thier dominant foot, what they have seen the kicker do, and thier body language
    ReplyDelete
  18. The problem is that penalty kicks can only really be expressed as a zero-sum game. What the goalie chooses is not in isolation, and he cannot do the same thing every time. The best penalty takers in history, guys like Rainer Bonhof, John Robertson and Michel Platini, were virtually unstoppable due to power and placement: what the keeper was going to do didn't concern them. I recall seeing Platini miss twice but I don't recall seeing Bonhof or Robertson miss one. Likewise some keepers just seemed to feast on the less accurate shooters, Harald Schumacher and Paul Copper come to mind from the 70's and 80's.

    This talk about "psyching out" is twaddle: if your mind is weak then you don't belong in the position of taking the kick. There are locations in the net that there is no way for a keeper to reach if you hit the ball accurately and with some pace. Most misses are simply down to poor technique and a weak mind.
    ReplyDelete
  19. Hi folks! Great article! I've found a nice research on http://penaltyhq.com, it is a rather fresh one. They've analyzed 1000+ penalty kicks. Check out who shoots with the best conversation rates and who is the best goalkeeper. As far as I know they processed the last 5 seasons in major EU leagues. Interesting, my favourite Zlatan Ibrahimovic is in the top10 converting all of his 14 attempts. The No.1 is a less known Hungarian Josef Kanta with 16/16.
    ReplyDelete

Leave Comments Here: