Penalty kicks are a critical time of decision making for both the goal keeper and the penalty taker. Given that, for most professional games, the average number of goals scored is around 2.5, a penalty kick can have a major influence on the outcome of a match. Penalty kicks may reach speeds near 125 mph and is usually over within a quarter of a second. Thus, the goal keeper must make a decision on how to stop the shot before the ball is struck. Statistics show that goal keepers will most often jump to the left or right, hoping to guess correctly and place him (or her) self in a position to block the kick. Is this action by the keeper the best strategy? Research headed by Michael Bar-Eli at the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Israel makes some interesting conclusions about how goal keepers should defend penalty kicks.
The researchers analyzed the video of 286 penalty kicks from professional leagues in Europe and South America as well as from the European Championships and World Cup competitions. They coded each PK into one of three vertical (high, middle or low) and horizontal (right, center or left) directions. Shots that missed the goal were not included in these analyses. They also coded goalkeeper movements (jump right, jump left or stay central) and whether or not they stopped the shot. Using simple statistics, they compared the success of goalkeepers in stopping shots based on their movements and where the ball was placed.
From the penalty kicker’s standpoint, 85% of the penalty shots placed on goal were successful. A bit more than half of the shots taken were placed in the lower one-third of the goal (57%). These low attempts were successful ~80% of the time. By comparison, only 13% of shots were placed in the upper third of the goal. However, all of these efforts resulted in a goal scored (100% success).
Slightly more shots were placed to the goal keeper’s right side compared to the center or left. Of these three directions, kickers were most successful when shooting at the center of the goal. Shots aimed at the center of the goal were successful 87% of the time compared to an 83% success rate for shots placed at the outer thirds of the goal.
Based on these numbers, professional penalty kick takers most often place the ball at the lower right corner of the goal (40% of attempts). However, they are far more successful when shooting at the upper portion. Thus, the most successful strategy for the penalty kick taker is to place the ball in the upper third of the goal area rather than the lower portion. Assuming that the shot doesn’t go over the crossbar, placing the shot in the upper region of the goal will almost insure a successful attempt.
Goal keeping behavior explains part of the goal scoring successes. In attempting to stop the penalty kick, goal keepers jump to the right or left 94% of the time. In doing this, they guess correctly only about 40% of the time (i.e. jump left, shot placed left). However, even when they guess correctly, they only stop 25-30% of the shots. The most intriguing part of the Dr. Bar-Eli’s analyses is that when goal keepers remain in the center of the goal and the shot is placed in the center, they make the save 60% of the time. Given that about 30% of penalty kicks are placed in the center third of the goal, remaining stationary in the center of the goal increases the keepers chances of stopping the shot from about 13% to more than 33%.
Thus, the best strategy for goal keepers is to remain in the center of the goal during the penalty kick. Thus the idea that goal keepers should jump left or right and hope they guess correctly is not supported by these numbers.
Why might there be more success when the goal keeper stays in the center of the net? When a keeper jumps in one direction, he/she is only able to cover about 1/9 of the goal area (usually the lower corner) plus a bit of the central area. Thus, if the ball is placed in the side or upper third, the keeper has very little chance of stopping the shot. The keeper is either out of position of in a poor position to stop the shot. However, if the keeper remains in the center of the goal area, he/she can cover closer to one third of the goal area (the upper-, middle- and lower-central areas).
If these numbers are correct, then why do goalies jump left or right in their effort to stop penalty kicks? Part of the decision may be based on experience, reading the shot taker’s body language and to opinion that diving is indeed the best strategy. Another reason probably lies in the concept of a “bias towards action”. This occurs with a decision is based on perceived need to “do something” rather than nothing. In sports, it is often said that mistakes are more forgivable if they are made at full speed. Diving to the left or right gives the appearance of effort and avoids the perception that he/or she didn’t attempt to make a save. In fact, a survey of goal keepers show that the vast majority feel worse if a goal is scored when they remain central versus diving to the left or right.
The take home message is that from a statistical standpoint, it may be more advantageous for a goal keeper to defend a penalty kick by remaining in the goal’s center rather than diving to one side. Despite the need to make a heroic effort, this situation may require doing less rather than more.
References:
Bar-Eli M, Azar OH (2009) Penalty kicks in soccer: an empirical analysis of shooting strategies and goalkeepers preferences. Soccer & Society, 10:183-191.
Bar-Eli M, Azar OH, Ritov I, Keidar-Levin Y, Schein G (2007) Action bias among elite soccer goal keepers: the case of penalty kicks. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28:606-621.
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Penalty Kicks… By the Numbers
Labels:
Goalkeepers,
Strategy
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


13 comments:
Scientists in the Netherlands did a similar study about 15 yrs ago and came to essentially the same conclusions. Keepers are most successful staying in the middle and forcing the kicker to make a decision, then reacting as best possible to where the ball is kicked.
Staying in the middle will only be more successful if the kicker thinks the keeper will move. Therefore a keeper who only stands in the middle, once scoted by opponents, will succeed 0% of the time if they just stand there. Some sort of mixture with the majority of movements being remaining central would have to be the best plan from a keepers perspective.
These findings aren't surprising at all, and I have always wondered why every keeper needs to dive on PKs, most just guessing a side, when they would never do the same thing when trying to make a save during normal play.
The above comment is correct in the context of a shootout or when the opposition has scouting on the keeper. Obviously any team or keeper who goes with a strategy different from the norm on a regular basis or in a big match will get publicity for it and it won't be a surprise anymore. But to incorporate covering the middle of the goal as an option to be used maybe half the time is worth studying.
I see two areas of study for goalkeeping coaches going forward based on these type of studies.
One: Can a new PK defending technique be developed to incorporate both reading the shooter's body language and the keeper remaining central and on his/her feet longer to better stop shots?
Two: What positioning and strategy forces the shooter to make the most difficult shots? Obviously the easiest shot to get on goal is right down the middle, and the reason that many shooters don't want to shoot high is the fear of missing the shot. A goalkeeping technique that forces the shooter to aim for the high and wide areas of the goal, and to shoot with more power giving up precision, would force more misses and thus be more successful.
Not counting the shots that miss the goal makes this study worthless. The conclusion is that players taking a penalty should aim for a top corner--true only if they never miss! But how often do players miss the goal entirely based upon where they were aiming? I.e. if a player shooting for the top third is never denied by the keeper but misses the goal 25% of the time that is a worse outcome than the player who aims for the lower third and keeps the ball on target 95% of the time, despite the fact that the goalkeeper will then save the shot 20% of the time.
An incomplete analysis at best...
A soccer ball doesn't travel 125 mph, I don't care who is kicking it.
This study definitely has some good perspective....but it certainly must be followed up with more detailed studies and analysis (something that i expect from a doctor.....otherwise they should've just let me do this paper).
Obviously you cant conclude that keepers should stay central or then shooters would just stop shooting centrally and eventually we'd get back to where we are. A much more interesting talk would be to see how goalkeepers could incorporate methods to choose the best directions to dive/not dive to increase success......though luck will always be the prevailing factor.
Not sure if this is a factor in the 'keeper's decision, but a diving save will get your teammates and fans more pumped up than will a save made while standing like a tree.
Every action has a reaction, shooting towards the upper right will not insure greater success because if more and more players shot in that direction, goalkeepers would adjust accordingly.
Still, great research and great website. The most glaring statistic for me is that 85% of penalty shots are successful. What this says is that the tie-breaking system is broken. Basically a shooter is never supposed to miss. A fairer system gives a fair chance to the shooter to convert AND to the goalkeeper to save.
Thus, the spot should be moved back from its current position. More shots will sail high or wide, but an 85% success rate under the current system is unacceptable. Games should not be decided just because a shooter succumbs to mental duress, which is usually the only reason for a miss considering the high conversion rate.
Actually, I never saw a problem with the old American system of having a shooter dribble towards the goal starting from 35 yards out.
1. Gives the excitement of a breakaway.
2. More resembles actual play
3. More fair to the goalkeeper.
I agree; the American system worked, even though purists here hated it. Of course, my preference has nothing to with the fact that I was pretty good at this drill in high school. ;)
the stats are interesting...however, stopping a PK as a GK is an intuitive skill utilizing all of the above stategies at various times...
Ilearned a lot from this reading.
Most saved penalties are the result of poorly struck kicks, the keeper cannot really do a whole lot, its up to kicker to miss in other words.
what are the odds of a keeper making 5 penalty saves in one game in a tournament to advance to the next round.... not too high i can tell you that but i did it. stopping penalties is my specialty. i stopped 5 in one game when we couldnt score in extra time we went to penalties. then my team missed the net and put the pressure on me. but i stopped all the shots that shootout. im 19, and my shoot out save percentage is more than 50% i know that.
Post a Comment
Leave Comments Here: